![]() After you generate terms and conditions or a privacy policy, your users should have the chance to agree or disgaree to these terms.īut many site owners are confused about - or completely unaware of - what these agreements actually are and what they do. Compliance Quiz Answer a few questions to see if your business is compliant.īrowsewrap and clickwrap agreements are contracts made between you and the user.Documentation & Support Termly troubleshooting & documentation.Legal Dictionary Legal terms defined in simple English.FAQs Frequently asked questions and answers about data privacy and regulations.What is GDPR? Termly’s simple guide to the GDPR.Privacy News Stay up to date on the latest in data privacy news.Articles Informational articles on privacy law compliance & best practices.Templates Legal policy templates and how-to guides.Cookie Banner Generator Create a compliant consent banner.Cookie Scanner Scan & classify your cookies.Cookie Consent Manager Obtain consent & manage cookie preferences.Legal Policies Attorney-crafted documents and policies.The advantage with FCP X is (I think I'm correct here) is that you can start cutting the original files and if the going gets tough, tick a checkbox and FCP X will transcode everything to ProRes seamlessly. ![]() While you might get away with not transcoding to ProRes for simple cuts-only projects, throw in a few transitions, colour corrections and effects and you'll see the advantage. He was shooting HDV and editing in the HDV codec in PP (on a PC) and suffering from stuttering problems as his CPU struggled to keep up. Premiere Pro still costs $600 (although I reckon everyone who has it has the education version.).Īs for the CPU usage thing, I was reading a blog from a pro editor written about 2 years ago. You can now get standalone Motion and Compressor for $50 each, so essentially I can get set up for 1/3 of the cost. Motion and Compressor were unavailable as standalone products and had to be bought as part of Final Cut Studio which was around A$1200 when work bought it for me. I paid around the same money for Final Cut Express. We had two simultaneous tracks of HD footage, and it was slower than having seven simultaneous SD tracks on a G5 PowerMac.Ĭlick to expand.It's amazing how much perceptions shift. PS: We once edited highly compressed HD footage on a Mac Pro with two quad core CPUs, and it was not really a good experience. mov files, but that is only, if you use FCP X and choose not to let FCP X transcode the footage.Īnyway, as I don't mind transcoding (it can happen over night - I transcoded two hours of HD footage in six hours on my 2007 iMac with a 2 GHz C2D CPU), and actually prefer using a proper editing due to less CPU usage and faster reaction times in my editing application, I might not be the best judge for ClipWrap. The other advantage is, that the rewrapped files will also use less space than the transcoded. If you have a fast Mac and don't mind high CPU usage during playback and editing in FCP X, ClipWrap might be the way to go, if you don't want to transcode the footage. If you use FCP X and don't select to transcode the imported footage, you will have higher CPU usage during playback and applying of effects, as it needs to render more, due to H.264 not being an editing codec. ![]() Thus you will have high CPU usage either way. The advantage of ClipWrap is, that you don't need to transcode the video right now, it will only happen during import into iMovie and in FCP X in the background. If you use iMovie, the video will be transcoded anyway to the Apple Intermediate Codec, as mentioned before.įCP X will (unless unchecked) transcode the video too, though it will be in the background. ![]() mov files, but the codec will be the same. Yes, ClipWrap allows you to rewrap the format to. I can't try any of this myself yet as my MBP doesn't arrive until next week. Does iMovie work with QuickTime files and would it keep the quality? I'd like to use iMovie rather than FCP and save myself £200. One workaround I was given in the FCP forum to retrieve files stored on the hard drive was to convert them to QuickTime files, this way the software would recognize them, and there would be no loss of quality. But having done more research I'm starting to think that it does but it needs to be imported direct from a camera and cannot be retrieved from the hard disc, is this right? If you can use mts does it keep the quality or does it convert the format and lose quality? The reason I was looking at FCP was because I was told that iMovie 11 doesn't support AVCHD/mts. I've been asking a few questions on the Final Cut Pro forum about the lack of mts support, or rather the lack of the software's ability to recognize mts files stored on the hard drive, it can only import mts files direct from a camera/camcorder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |